Population aging and government transfer dependency in Greene County as of 2022

Population aging and government transfer dependency in Greene County as of 2022
John Lettieri, President and CEO of Economic Innovation Group — Official Website
0Comments

In 2022, Greene County received $157 million in government transfer payments, equivalent to $11,585 per capita.

These payments—which include Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and income maintenance—accounted for 35.5% of all personal income in the county, according to information from the Economic Innovation Group.

This marks a significant increase in the county’s reliance on government transfers compared to 2012, when such payments made up 29.5% of total income. Since then, the share has risen by 6%.

Government transfer payments are non-repayable funds provided by federal, state, or local governments to support individuals in need. These payments aim to stabilize economic conditions and provide financial support during hardships. Key programs include Social Security transfers (retirement benefits), Medicare transfers (healthcare for seniors), Medicaid transfers (healthcare for low-income individuals), and income maintenance transfers (financial assistance for basic needs).

In 2022, government transfers in Greene County primarily focused on older adults—such as Social Security transfers, which totaled $46.5 million (29.6% of all transfer income), and Medicare, which accounted for $54 million (34.4%)—played a significant role in the county’s overall income.

On a per capita basis, Social Security payments rose from $2,801 in 2012 and $821 in 1970 to $3,430 in 2022, reflecting a 22.5% increase over the past decade and a 317.8% shift since 1970.

Similarly, Medicare transfers climbed from $2,426 in 2012 and $219 in 1970 to $3,983, marking 64.2% and 1,718.7% increases, respectively.

These increases in per capita payments align with shifts in the county’s age distribution. In 2022, residents aged 65 and older made up 16% of the total population, compared to 12.3% in 2012 and 10.9% in 1970. While the senior share of the population has increased, the rise in per capita Social Security and Medicare transfers suggests that these assistance programs for older adults now require a larger share of government funding—either due to growing needs, expanded eligibility, higher benefit levels, or increased enrollment.

According to the Economic Innovation Group, total income in Greene County excluding public assistance amounted to $21,065 per capita in 2022, compared to $32,650 when government transfers were included.

Breaking down the other contributions in the county, Medicaid transfers made up $27.6 million, a 17.6% share of total income, while income maintenance programs, including assistance such as SNAP or TANF, added another $16.1 million, or 10.3% of the total.

Compared to the previous year, Greene County’s reliance on government transfers decreased by 3.6%.

Government transfers have long been a modest financial safety net, historically comprising only a small fraction of Americans’ income. However, since the 1970s—sometimes dubbed the “Great Transfer-mation”—dependency has surged from 8.2% (or $2,016 per capita in inflation-adjusted 2022 dollars) in 1970 to 17.6% (or $11,529 per capita) in 2022 nationwide.

According to the Economic Innovation Group’s analysis, these trends are not merely short-term responses to economic pressures but rather reflect a profound, long-term transformation in how government support is integrated into American life. The study illustrates that structural shifts—from rising healthcare expenses and demographic changes to stagnant wages—have significantly increased dependency on government transfers.

Breakdown of Government Transfers by Program in Greene County, 2022

2022 Mississippi County Rankings by Per Capita Government Transfers

County State Rank (Per Capita Transfers) Dependency on Transfers (%) % Population 65+ Social Security Transfers (%) Medicare Transfers (%) Medicaid Transfers (%) Income Maintenance Transfers (%) Per Capita Transfers ($)
Sharkey County 1 44.54% 21.61% 27.1% 24% 27.5% 15.1% $20,533
Quitman County 2 50% 18.72% 23.6% 24.8% 28.9% 16.2% $19,109
Holmes County 3 53.29% 16.62% 21.7% 24.7% 25.5% 16.7% $18,081
Coahoma County 4 41.37% 16.87% 23.1% 22.3% 29.6% 16.5% $17,951
Humphreys County 5 43% 19% 24.6% 23.3% 26.5% 19.6% $17,002
Lawrence County 6 38.16% 19.64% 33.1% 33.1% 14.5% 9.7% $16,861
Yalobusha County 7 40% 21.87% 35.4% 31.5% 14.4% 10.3% $16,800
Claiborne County 8 46.66% 18.14% 24.3% 24.4% 20.9% 15.4% $16,329
Montgomery County 9 39.16% 22.86% 31.1% 29.1% 20.4% 10.9% $16,241
Bolivar County 10 34.31% 17.42% 26.5% 28% 22.2% 15.4% $16,081
Noxubee County 11 38.64% 18.17% 26.3% 24.9% 23.9% 17.5% $15,627
Jefferson County 12 41.14% 19.57% 27.7% 25.1% 23.8% 16% $15,483
Simpson County 13 33.92% 19.22% 27.6% 25.8% 29.1% 9.9% $15,375
Franklin County 14 38.36% 21.51% 32% 32.5% 17.3% 9.7% $15,357
Kemper County 15 41.31% 22.45% 27.2% 28.9% 16.7% 11.7% $15,289
Jefferson Davis County 16 42.15% 24.56% 29.8% 29.3% 18.8% 13.2% $15,237
Washington County 17 34.95% 18.16% 28.4% 23.1% 22.5% 18.2% $15,200
Calhoun County 18 37.33% 20.82% 34.1% 26.4% 20.2% 10.9% $15,069
Webster County 19 34.33% 18.36% 34% 27.3% 20% 9.8% $15,024
Leflore County 20 32.13% 15.62% 25.2% 20.8% 27.7% 17.6% $15,010
Adams County 21 32.89% 22% 31.6% 27.3% 20.1% 12.2% $14,964
Clarke County 22 34.42% 22.36% 34.1% 29.1% 17.2% 10% $14,748
Wilkinson County 23 41.4% 19.65% 26.6% 29.4% 24.7% 13.4% $14,708
Marion County 24 35.24% 18.99% 31.8% 27.7% 20% 11.9% $14,633
Attala County 25 34% 19.62% 30.9% 30.7% 17.8% 11.5% $14,630
Clay County 26 30.56% 19.86% 33.4% 27.2% 16.6% 13.6% $14,565
Grenada County 27 34% 18.75% 33.3% 28% 18.3% 12.3% $14,483
Benton County 28 34.91% 19.79% 33.1% 29.5% 17.6% 12.4% $14,478
Jasper County 29 30.37% 21.7% 33.5% 26.6% 19.1% 11.6% $14,319
Winston County 30 32% 21.46% 34.9% 25.3% 18.7% 12.7% $14,029
Tishomingo County 31 32.74% 21.24% 38.1% 29% 16.2% 7.7% $13,844
Jones County 32 29.97% 17.99% 29.9% 22.9% 27.8% 10.4% $13,808
Chickasaw County 33 35.4% 18.8% 32.5% 27.7% 18.2% 12.5% $13,805
Covington County 34 30.7% 17.36% 32.1% 28% 16.2% 12.3% $13,747
Alcorn County 35 30.32% 19.13% 36.8% 27.5% 17.2% 9.8% $13,637
Tallahatchie County 36 35.31% 17.55% 28.2% 27.8% 20.5% 16.3% $13,576
Copiah County 37 34.52% 19.44% 30.6% 27.5% 16.9% 14% $13,493
Pike County 38 36.98% 17.71% 29.7% 26.7% 18.2% 13.8% $13,429
Walthall County 39 35.7% 20.69% 33.4% 24.9% 20% 12.6% $13,418
Tippah County 40 31.28% 17.52% 33.6% 28.6% 18.8% 10.6% $13,393
Sunflower County 41 38% 15.12% 26.2% 25.7% 21.7% 17.7% $13,262
Lauderdale County 42 27.98% 18.76% 31.2% 25.3% 19% 11.8% $13,183
Stone County 43 33.37% 17.34% 30.1% 27.6% 11.5% 9.3% $13,135
Panola County 44 32.45% 17.79% 32.7% 27.4% 16.8% 15% $13,115
Monroe County 45 30.19% 20.46% 37.2% 26.9% 15.3% 10.1% $13,099
Warren County 46 27% 18.9% 32.9% 27.6% 17% 13.1% $13,001
Smith County 47 27.5% 21.17% 37.7% 25.6% 17.9% 10.9% $12,989
Leake County 48 30.97% 18.28% 30.5% 30.2% 17.3% 12.9% $12,941
Carroll County 49 29.94% 24.99% 40.9% 26.9% 13.8% 10.1% $12,902
Choctaw County 50 31.41% 23.42% 30.1% 27% 22.9% 11.9% $12,835
Neshoba County 51 27.97% 16.37% 30.2% 28.7% 20.1% 12.7% $12,760
Tunica County 52 32.14% 13.83% 26.5% 23% 20.4% 21.4% $12,740
Marshall County 53 29.81% 18.95% 35% 27.6% 14.2% 14% $12,720
Wayne County 54 28.63% 18.19% 33.2% 22.9% 19.5% 14.2% $12,650
Newton County 55 31.37% 17.45% 33.3% 25.3% 18.1% 10.9% $12,638
Amite County 56 32.59% 26.2% 38.8% 22.8% 17.9% 11% $12,498
Pearl River County 57 28.61% 19.64% 37.4% 27.2% 11.8% 10.1% $12,335
Scott County 58 31.99% 15.81% 29.8% 31.3% 18.2% 13.6% $12,312
Hinds County 59 26.23% 16.3% 30.8% 24.8% 17.5% 15.5% $12,290
Lincoln County 60 27.33% 17.9% 35% 24.6% 20.6% 10.8% $12,191
Lowndes County 61 25.24% 17.37% 32.9% 24.4% 14.8% 12.5% $12,182
Yazoo County 62 34.74% 14.73% 28.8% 26% 21.9% 15.9% $12,157
Prentiss County 63 32.17% 17.75% 34.3% 29.8% 15.5% 10.2% $12,078
Itawamba County 64 28.5% 17.55% 38.3% 26.2% 13.8% 8.8% $11,704
Greene County 65 35.48% 16% 29.6% 34.4% 17.6% 10.3% $11,585
Hancock County 66 26.1% 22.4% 38.4% 26.5% 13% 9.5% $11,584
Harrison County 67 25% 16.55% 32.5% 24.4% 13.5% 11.1% $11,576
Tate County 68 26.64% 16.73% 36.9% 27.7% 10.8% 11.4% $11,544
Perry County 69 31.77% 19.47% 39.5% 13.8% 21.6% 13.1% $11,539
Lee County 70 22.12% 15.55% 37.2% 28% 13.7% 11.2% $11,513
Forrest County 71 26.61% 13.87% 30.8% 20.2% 19% 11.8% $11,254
Union County 72 26.87% 16.66% 40.3% 27.1% 13.1% 10.7% $10,962
Jackson County 73 22.93% 17.25% 39.9% 24.3% 10.9% 10.6% $10,527
George County 74 26.81% 14.73% 36.1% 28.5% 13% 11.4% $10,384
Pontotoc County 75 24.97% 15.39% 37.9% 27.8% 13.6% 11.7% $10,355
Rankin County 76 18.1% 16.71% 39.3% 26.5% 16.2% 8% $9,722
Madison County 77 11.47% 15.42% 42.1% 26.4% 10.1% 10.1% $9,109
Lafayette County 78 17.94% 13.78% 34.3% 22.4% 21.9% 7.7% $8,882
Lamar County 79 18.22% 15.3% 35.6% 32.9% 9.4% 10.9% $8,830
Oktibbeha County 80 22% 12.26% 31.4% 23.2% 16.7% 11.8% $8,640
Issaquena County 81 33.64% 15.61% 22.4% 25.5% 26.9% 19.5% $8,237
DeSoto County 82 15.2% 13.54% 41.5% 27.3% 4.8% 11.5% $7,942


Related

2022: Correlation between aging and increasing government transfer dependency in Wayne County?

2022: Correlation between aging and increasing government transfer dependency in Wayne County?

Since 1970, Wayne County’s population aged over 65 has increased by 8%, while income from age-related government transfers has risen by 0.1%.

How many H-1B petitions approved for employers classified under the Educational Services industry in Pine Belt Times publication area during 2024?

How many H-1B petitions approved for employers classified under the Educational Services industry in Pine Belt Times publication area during 2024?

In 2024, 100% of H-1B petitions filed by Educational Services employers across Pine Belt Times publication area were approved, according to data from the U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services via the H-1B Employer Data Hub.

2022: Perry County aging and government transfer dependency trends

2022: Perry County aging and government transfer dependency trends

Since 1970, Perry County’s population aged over 65 has increased by 9.4%, while income from age-related government transfers has fallen by 9.9%.

Trending

The Weekly Newsletter

Sign-up for the Weekly Newsletter from Pine Belt Times.